tMoA

~ The only Home on the Web You'll ever need ~


    HIV a government lie?

    Share
    avatar
    Neteru

    Posts : 94
    Join date : 2012-02-06
    Age : 29
    Location : Earth. For now.

    HIV a government lie?

    Post  Neteru on Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:39 pm

    http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/


    According to this site and others it doesn't exist.


    So what causes AIDS?
    avatar
    Neteru

    Posts : 94
    Join date : 2012-02-06
    Age : 29
    Location : Earth. For now.

    Re: HIV a government lie?

    Post  Neteru on Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:45 pm

    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
    Office of the Secretary
    Washington D.C.


    April 28, 1987
    MEDIA ALERT

    An NCI grantee scientist, Dr. Peter Duesberg of California/Berkeley, has published a paper in a scientific journal which concludes that the HTLV-III/HIV virus identified by Dr. Gallo and Dr. Montagnier is not the cause of AIDS and that the disease is caused by "a still unidentified agent" which may not even be a virus.

    Inexplicably, the paper was published in the March 1 addition of Cancer Research, and gives a non-specific credit to Dr. Robert Gallo and others, but nobody within the Department or the news media seems to have been aware of it until it was disclosed Monday, 4/27, by a gay publication in New York City.

    Dr. Duesberg has been an NCI grantee doing research in retroviruses and oncogenes for 17 years and is highly regarded. He is the recipient of an "outstanding researcher" award from the Department. The article apparently went through the normal pre-publication process and should have been flagged at NIH. Failing that, it should have caused a splash on publication nearly two months ago.

    Playwright, gay activist and Department critic Larry Kramer is currently bringing it to the attention of the media, but it really hasn't taken off yet. I know for instance he has talked to Tom Brokaw about it. There has been one call to CDC from Newsday and none to the press office so far.

    This obviously has the potential to raise a lot of controversy (if this isn't the virus, how do we know the blood supply is safe? How do we know anything about transmission? How could you all be so stupid and why should we ever believe you again?) and we need to be prepared to respond. I have already asked NIH public affairs to start digging into this.

    Chuck Kline

    http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/hhsalert.htm


    Crazy Happy Crazy Happy Crazy Happy Crazy Happy Crazy Happy
    avatar
    Neteru

    Posts : 94
    Join date : 2012-02-06
    Age : 29
    Location : Earth. For now.

    Re: HIV a government lie?

    Post  Neteru on Tue Feb 28, 2012 2:17 pm

    Now on the drug that is used to treat "HIV":

    AZT stands for azidothymidine, a drug often marketed under the names Zidovudine or Retrovir. As with Septra, AZT is produced by the pharmaceutical giant Burroughs Wellcome. Both drugs have toxic effects. But compared to the sulfa drug, AZT amounts to poison. The doctor herself admitted some of the effects in her medical report of the visit, stating that Lindsey's "mother was explained the side effects of Zidovudine which are primarily bone marrow suppression with anemia, sometimes nausea and vomiting and rarely the cause of other symptoms like skin rash.", If anything, this understated the effects. AZT kills dividing cells anywhere in the body-causing ulcerations and hemorrhaging; damage to hair follicles and skin; killing mitochondria, the energy cells of the brain; wasting away of muscles; and the destruction of the immune system and other blood cells. Children are affected more severely, because many more of their cells are growing than in adults. (3) Amazingly, AZT was first approved for treatment of AIDS in 1987 and then for prevention of AIDS in 1990.


    http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/pdazt.htm


    Crazy Happy Crazy Happy Crazy Happy

    Sponsored content

    Re: HIV a government lie?

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Mon Sep 25, 2017 7:18 pm